<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google and Duplication of Content: Be Careful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netwriting.co.uk/google/google-and-duplication-of-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netwriting.co.uk/google/google-and-duplication-of-content/79/</link>
	<description>Writing and SEO tips for Bloggers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:58:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lampard</title>
		<link>http://www.netwriting.co.uk/google/google-and-duplication-of-content/79/comment-page-1/#comment-1686</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lampard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwriting.co.uk/2007/07/03/google-and-duplication-of-content/#comment-1686</guid>
		<description>Splogs - now there&#039;s a name for you! I&#039;ve also recently noticed a whole bunch of &quot;blogs&quot; that virtually consist *only* of Google ads! 

There&#039;s not even duplicated content on them. I&#039;m guessing their titles/names reflect popular search engine look up terms and that&#039;s they expect to draw in their traffic, and, er, revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Splogs &#8211; now there&#8217;s a name for you! I&#8217;ve also recently noticed a whole bunch of &#8220;blogs&#8221; that virtually consist *only* of Google ads! </p>
<p>There&#8217;s not even duplicated content on them. I&#8217;m guessing their titles/names reflect popular search engine look up terms and that&#8217;s they expect to draw in their traffic, and, er, revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.netwriting.co.uk/google/google-and-duplication-of-content/79/comment-page-1/#comment-1666</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 19:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwriting.co.uk/2007/07/03/google-and-duplication-of-content/#comment-1666</guid>
		<description>Thanks Juggling frogs, it&#039;s frustrating but it&#039;s not the end of the world. I have 5 main sites and I don&#039;t expect it will last forever. However, it does show the benefits of not putting all your eggs in one basket so to speak of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Juggling frogs, it&#8217;s frustrating but it&#8217;s not the end of the world. I have 5 main sites and I don&#8217;t expect it will last forever. However, it does show the benefits of not putting all your eggs in one basket so to speak of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juggling Frogs</title>
		<link>http://www.netwriting.co.uk/google/google-and-duplication-of-content/79/comment-page-1/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>Juggling Frogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwriting.co.uk/2007/07/03/google-and-duplication-of-content/#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a bright side:  In the mean time (before they remove the penalty) you&#039;ll become ranked #1 for &quot;Google 950 Penalty&quot;!!  Talk about sweet revenge!

(I don&#039;t mean to make light of this, just trying to cheer you up.  I realize how aggravating and unfair this is.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a bright side:  In the mean time (before they remove the penalty) you&#8217;ll become ranked #1 for &#8220;Google 950 Penalty&#8221;!!  Talk about sweet revenge!</p>
<p>(I don&#8217;t mean to make light of this, just trying to cheer you up.  I realize how aggravating and unfair this is.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.netwriting.co.uk/google/google-and-duplication-of-content/79/comment-page-1/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwriting.co.uk/2007/07/03/google-and-duplication-of-content/#comment-1651</guid>
		<description>Thanks for concern, google don&#039;t do reviews of sites. They prefer to tweak their algorithms. I don&#039;t think it will last for ever. I know of other people who have had such a penalty removed, after a certain period of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for concern, google don&#8217;t do reviews of sites. They prefer to tweak their algorithms. I don&#8217;t think it will last for ever. I know of other people who have had such a penalty removed, after a certain period of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juggling Frogs</title>
		<link>http://www.netwriting.co.uk/google/google-and-duplication-of-content/79/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>Juggling Frogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwriting.co.uk/2007/07/03/google-and-duplication-of-content/#comment-1650</guid>
		<description>How frustrating!  Is there no way to appeal the Google penalty?  Do they have an option for a human to read your site, in order to show that it isn&#039;t a splog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How frustrating!  Is there no way to appeal the Google penalty?  Do they have an option for a human to read your site, in order to show that it isn&#8217;t a splog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.369 seconds -->

